Resolve the target
Use authoritative asset identity, tenant ownership, and current criticality to evaluate the proposed action.
Security operations
Automate the response.
Authorize the consequence.
For security leaders and managed security providers bringing agents into investigation, containment, and incident response.
Protect the response itself
A finding is not
permission to act.
An agent identifying a suspicious server still needs authority to isolate it. The right response depends on the tenant, the target, its criticality, and the operating policy.
Use Databridle’s authorization and evidence model around your existing response executor. Keep investigation logic and incident command in your security operation.
Example workflow / controlled containment
From proposed response
to confirmed effect.
Apply the operational policy
Allow authorized routine actions. Require accountable human approval before isolating a critical production resource.
Execute through existing response tools
Bind authorization to the specific target and operation. Preserve your response platform and incident workflow.
Verify the effect
Record execution failures, retries, and unknown outcomes. Confirm whether containment took effect and make remaining exposure visible.
For managed security providers
Protect your agents.
Extend protection to customers.
Bring a common action-control model to internal SOC automation and customer AI workflows. Build a repeatable offering around supported integrations, tenant boundaries, and clear operating ownership.
PrismWorks implementation maps tool interfaces, policy checks, and evidence into the response workflow, drawing on MCP connectivity and UAICP contracts where appropriate.
Explore the supporting technology ↗Explore the partner model ↗
Move forward with authority
Make autonomous response accountable.
Discuss your response workflows and security-platform integration with our team.